Adapting to the Digital Age

Technology is constantly evolving in our world today. As individuals, we are capable of doing everything by the touch of a single click, including reading journals, solving math equations, and googling answers to our own questions online. This allows us to have so much more access from a machine rather than our own thinking. So, it’s quite common for educators to keep up with society as they adapt to the way students are learning from modern technology. The internet has its benefits and consequences, but I am a strong believer that we should limit ourselves when using technology for learning.  Forcing yourself to read online, as well as multitasking, is much more challenging and equally draining for an individual.

In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr expresses how easy it is to find information using the internet with all the resources available to us. Although, we cannot depend all our thinking on the internet. Carr and other colleagues claim that it’s hard to stay focused while reading online due to many distractions the internet has to offer. Carr expresses from other colleagues who have stated that, “The more they use the Web, the more that have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (“Is Google Making Us Stupid?”). Distractions like video ads, music, and notifications that instantly pop up that take your attention away in a snap of your fingers. For example, as I am writing this paper, referencing back to the article I am easily distracting by the ads that are shown and even the notifications that pop up on my screen as well.

While you think you may be the only one who gets distracted when working online, Carr discusses this phenomena in his article stating, “Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle” (“Is Google Making Us Stupid?”). In his statement, Carr focusses on the point that reading online can become so boring and can make us become easily distracted with everything the internet has to offer such as social media, checking mail, and just searching the web rather than concentrating on the reading. Coincidentally, distractions could easily get confused with multitasking when working online.

I notice as I read different articles, Olivia Goldhill provides clear evidence similar to Carr’s evidence. Goldhill says, “That switching comes with a biological cost that ends up making us feel tired more quickly than if we sustain the attention on one thing.” (“Neuroscientist say multitasking literally drains the energy reserves of your brain”). She states that switching in between activities and tasks becomes more exhausting rather than productive. She even includes evidence that our brain uses oxygenated glucose which is burning out the same fuel needed to focus for single task. So imagine multitasking in between three different tasks and becoming ultimately overwhelmed—but really it’s your brain chemically over working itself to get everything you need done. Therefore, multitasking continues to make ourselves worn out and equally draining. It is suggested that a break is only needed in between tasks.

Completing two tasks at once is quite challenging when results do not come out as best as they could. Goldhill’s article she says “you can’t do two demanding, even simple tasks, in parallel.” This statement explains that we cannot focus or concentrate on doing two tasks at once because there’s no full attention on the one task that is needed to be done. For example, driving and texting is quite impossible and illegal, because not only is it a distraction, but it’s also putting yourself and others lives in harm’s way. We mentally cannot focus on the road and text because our attention should be fully focused on one thing at a time to get efficient results. Although, driving and texting is illegal and a major distraction, listening to music and driving is different because there’s no physical harm in it, because it doesn’t negatively affect the way we are completing a task. 

In the article, “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens” Jabr discusses the difference between reading on screen and paper. Jabr makes a good point—that we do read left to right in books while seeing the text as a whole with less distractions whatsoever. It’s a book, it’s in our hands, we turn the pages, our mind is constantly taking information in. For once, we are not overworking our brains with distractions and multitasking. When reading on paper it appears that we have a better way of imagining the text out as well as having a mental map of the text. Turning off all electronics and isolating yourself from distractions is a way for individuals to read a book to get less distracted. In contrast Jabr discusses the effects of reading online. Most digital screens do not always display as a paper book interfering with the way the text is presented to individuals. Individuals will scroll through a digital text, then begin to click on different pages as well as taking the time to go to the search function. Jabr states, “but it is difficult to see any one passage in the context of the entire text.” (“The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens”). Jabr means that sometime it’s better to see the text as whole instead of bits and pieces. Screen display a virtual page where one moment it’s there then gone and on paper we are able to retrace our footsteps.

As society is evolving and becoming more engaged in modern technology, many people suggest we should adapt our education system to the digital age. I’m here to say that we shouldn’t. The internet changes the way we think as our minds become more dependent on it. We lose sight and beauty of information that is physically around us to where we can’t think for ourselves anymore. When reading online, we tend to have a short attention span while becoming distracted by everything on the internet. As humans, we also tend to multitask with several things at one time. In result, we begin to lose focus of what we want to accomplish. With a physical book at hand we are able to see the full picture as well as not losing focus. Reading online and multitasking can completely over work our brains as distractions. However, as we know it, technology isn’t going anywhere, but only evolving as it is the future. Strategies that educators can conduct for students when using technology for reading online would be to limit ourselves from our phones and turning notifications off as we have a better focus off the text.

 

Ad from “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”

Driving while texting by: Brian Clausen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Classrooms Need to Evolve with Technology

According to the latest 2017 statistics based on technology use in the classroom, 98% of schools have one or more computers in the classroom (“Technology & Computers in Classroom Statistics”, Statistic Brain Research Institute). Why should your school be any different? Middle school is when students need the most guidance. We all remember being there, trying to figure out who we are as people and transitioning from the “kid” status to a “teenager” or “young adult” status. Kids in the twenty-first century get some sort of technological device by the time they are done with elementary school. By the time they get to middle school they are already more tech savvy than a lot of adults. Why not amalgamate something that they are drawn to and depend on into the classroom experience? Whether you have strict technology policies or not, the devices will be used in the classroom. So why not make it a productive use of technology? The middle school educational system should adapt by integrating some technology based resources; however, not 100% online schooling.

As you watch the kids come in to school every day, majority of them have their phone, iPod, iPad or laptop in hand. We live in a technological advancing society, if you continue to use the regular curriculum without the use of technology, you will be hurting our future since we are headed into a technological era. Cathy Davidson exclaims in her book, “A recent survey found that 84 percent of those polled said that they could not accomplish their day’s work if the computers were down at their office” (Davidson 10). Technology is used and depended on in the real world. Every school system’s job is preparing children for the real world, which results in students needing to be taught how to use technology properly. I know personally for my career (neonatal nursing), we depend on technology to help save patient’s lives, if you do not know how to use certain equipment then you are putting people’s lives in danger. According to Jabr’s article, “attitudes are changing as tablets and e-reading technology improve and reading digital books for facts and fun becomes more common”, even including those who prefer paper (Jabr “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens”). Whether we want it to or not, the technology is going to begin to become more and more advanced without stopping. Technological devices and digital books are becoming more communal, meaning we should teach students how to read and deal with the digital age so they know how to become competent members of society. Teachers would be able to do this by having their students read online articles and using the highlighting feature to get a greater comprehension of the articles. Teachers could also use the website “Hypothes.is” which allows the students to read articles while posting comments and annotating with their other classmates as they read, promoting more comprehensive reading.

There are a lot of benefits when it comes to assimilating technology into our classrooms. Not only does it prepare the students for our evolving society, but also for jobs in the future, as more and more jobs use a variety of technology. Since there are always new technological advances, we need to advance with the technology. If we want our students to learn then we need to be able to “disrupt an old pattern” to result in “a breakthrough that substitutes something new for something old” (Davidson 5). For the students to industriously learn, we should break the old habits and incorporate what they are used to in our curriculum. All this would require is the use of computers to write their papers, graphing on excel, creating and presenting PowerPoints, research, etc. It also makes us become better thinkers as we can access more information faster than before (“Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr). The more information you can access, allows you to be more productive since you are multitasking. If we can teach our students how to use technology to multitask profitably, then it will result in them being more knowledgeable and getting things done in a fast and efficient matter. Just being able to access articles faster though would promote their research ability. The teachers also need to teach them how to find a credible source. They can do this by having an in class activity where the teacher gives them a topic to research and the students use a certain criteria to assess which article is best, most professional and accurate.

The technology can be used in a lot of different ways in the classroom. On all the computers in the classrooms, a software interface can be downloaded forcing users to take breaks at certain times (“Neuroscientists say multitasking literally drains the energy reserves of your brain”, Goldhill). According to Levitin, “Studies have found that people who take 15-minute breaks every couple of hours end up being more productive” (qtd by Goldhill). If we promote breaks to our students, their overall education will improve. We set up our class schedule so students have just enough time to walk to their next classes, but no break. The only break we build into the schedule for our students is lunch, which is rushed and spent eating, not allowing time for relaxation, mind-wandering breaks, etc. If you were to install this software, it would ensure that throughout the day your students are getting the break they deserve, promoting more focus after the break. Students would also be able to perform research using the technology, which would end up saving time during the classes leading to more topics being covered in a shorter amount of time. As stated in Carr’s article, “Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes” (“Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr). If we implement technology based research assignments, then the students will be able to get the research done faster compared to the past. The faster they can perform their hands-on learning experiences, the more you will be able to cover in one class period leading to more knowledgeable students leaving your school at the end of the day.

We should start integrating technology into the classrooms in the middle schools because overall that’s when the students will be able to pick it up the easiest. In elementary school, they are dedicated to teaching the kids how school works and the basics of schooling. By the time they are in middle school, they are changing, their life is changing, there mind is changing, preparing the students for high school. There are a lot of changes in the middle school years, so why not just add this in and teach them how to use technology productively as they have already been using it for a few years and are starting to get the hang of it. If we focus on how to multitask, and use the technology in a beneficial way during these years of their lives then in high school they will already know how to use it properly. High school’s coursework is a lot more vigorous and fast paced, so why not teach the students before they get there how to handle that type of work by using technology and multitasking?

Works cited:

Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company. 27 Apr. 2017. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/.

Davidson, Cathy N. Now you see it: how the brain science of attention will transform the way we live, work and learn. Viking, 2011.

Goldhill, Olivia. “Neuroscientists say multitasking literally drains the energy reserves of your brain.” Neuroscientists say multitasking literally drains the energy reserves of your brain. Quartz. 3 July 2016. qz.com/722661/neuroscientists-say-multitasking-literally-drains-the-energy-reserves-of-your-brain/.

Jabr, Ferris. “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens.” The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens. Scientific American. 11 Apr. 2013. www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/.

Statistic Brain Research Institute. “Technology & Computers in Classroom Statistics.” Statistic Brain. Statistic Brain Research Institute. 25 Sept. 2017. www.statisticbrain.com/technology-computers-in-classroom-statistics/.