Proposal Recommendations

Tayla Wibecan 

Amanda Reandeau

Akira Merchant

  1. We would change the background to be less busy, more modern, and link more to the content of the Greenspring Review. We feel that the books make it feel outdated and there’s more to the website than just books or writing. 
  2. We like how team two and three had a direct link to upload a submission. 
  3. We like the organization of team two’s issues area. Where it started with the categories (Creative writing, journalistic writing, and visual art) and then went into the date/time.
  4. The issues and writing submissions should have pictures along with the title. If you look at most literature review websites such as the Guernica Literary Magazine, each writing piece has a picture to grab the reader’s attention. 
  5. We liked a mix of team two and team three’s about me section, with the circle head shots of each editor along with a quote by them. They should also include a short paragraph of what the green spring review is and its history under the about page. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *