Final Reflection

In Authentic Learning in the Digital Age: Engaging Students Through Inquiry, Larissa Pahomov writes, “For student reflection to be meaningful, it must be metacognitive, applicable, and shared with others,” and defines metacognitive reflection as taking the process of reflection “to the next level because it is concerned not with assessment, but with self-improvement: Could this be better? How? What steps should you take?” (read full article here). In light of this assertion, I would like you to write a metacognitive reflection on the final project. This reflection should address the following questions, with an aim to identify how you could improve your work.

  1. What did you learn through the process of creating and presenting this project? How did this project help you synthesize and apply the topics we covered throughout the semester? Do you have suggestions to improve this assignment?
  2. What readings, activities, assignments, and discussions did you find particularly helpful, informative, and engaging in this class this semester? What would you suggest be changed to improve this course next time it is offered?
  3. Bonus question: if we were to rename this course in the future, what should this course be called? What title would appeal to students?

You may expand or add to these guidelines in any way you wish. This is your opportunity to speak directly to me about what you learned in this course.

This will be submitted as a Google Doc (title: finalreflection_yoursection_yourlastname for example finalreflection_381_licastro) that you share with me upon completion. You must invite me as an editor (with privileges to edit, not just read or comment). You will complete this by the day of our scheduled final exam, 5/11 at 4:15pm.

Also, please include this statement at the bottom of the document and fill in your name and response:

I ____________ do/ do not give Dr. Amanda Licastro permission to use my final project as an example in scholarly presentations and publications.

Career Fair for English Majors

The career fair that was hosted on Friday was better than I anticipated. Everyone who attended was friendly, engaging, and passionate about either their present career or their future endeavors. The panel of writers and guests who spoke at the event were so knowledgeable about their respective fields. They were more than happy to speak with anyone who had an interest in either the company they worked for, the type of writing they did for a living, etc. After speaking with the assistant editor of the Baltimore Magazine, I’m considering applying for an internship with a magazine as a possible career route.

One of the best segments of the fair was when Professor Smith asked the members of the panel to give all of the students some words of wisdom. They mentioned the standard “believe in yourself” and “don’t lose hope”. A very popular piece of advice was to complete an internship, which Megan Bosse (communications associate at the Baltimore Office of Promotion & the Arts) took a step further. She mentioned how we could learn different qualities about ourselves through various internships. But, they had some more practical advice as well. They suggested that we should strive to “be as versatile as possible”. We should try to pick up extra skills besides writing in order to be as helpful and marketable as we can be, which does make a lot of sense.

But, probably the most comforting thing I was personally able to take away from the fair is how a person’s career doesn’t have to be a neat and orderly sequence of events. No one on the panel ended up where they thought they would initially, but each one still has a job that they are proud of. The future looks brighter than it did before.

 

Career Fair Reflection

The English Career Fair last Friday, March 31st featured four speakers and several potential employers that were we able to speak with. Being able to see how what we are taught in English classes will effect, influence open up career possibilities was a really neat opportunity. I found myself focusing in mostly on the possibility of working within the technical writing field and resume/applications tips offered by the speakers.

Lynda Del Genis was the speaker representing the technical writing field. She highlighted the importance of taking initiative within the workplace and the potential benefits of being proactive with on-the-job learning. Talking to her one on one, she told me that there is almost always opportunity to find work as a technical writer and that a subsection of technical writing known as industrial writing might interest me. I’m currently in my second year here at Stevenson so I’ll have awhile before I need to start seriously considering internship/job possibilities, but I’ll definitely look into that area when I begin my search.

According to the panel, writing is a fairly universal and transferable skill appreciated by many employers in many fields. The ability to write effectively should be highlighted, as well as demonstrated on any resume or application. Each round table member highlighted the importance of writing while sharing their personal “employment narratives” with us. Other advice included the completion of an internship, self-confidence, perseverance and communication skills. While job searching still seems somewhat anxiety inducing and stressful, attending this career fair did help improve my concept of what I should do to prepare for/look for, which does help keep things in perspective and manageable!

Emerging Careers in Writing–reflection

The Emerging Careers event gave me a lot of ideas on what I would and would not like to do with my future. I talked to Fitz Fitzgerald, Lynda Del Genis, Lydia Woolever, Katie Lindholm, and Barbara Hauck.

First, I sat down and talked with Lydia Woolever, associate editor of Baltimore Magazine, because I overheard talk of internship opportunities with her magazine. Ms. Woolever’s background really inspired me, as she had written for Esquire magazine, which is quite an accolade. The group and I picked her brain about what her secret to success was and she replied, “internships”. From my talk with her at the beginning and after the event, I learned that she basically leap-frogged from internship to internship until she landed her jobs. I asked her how she got her first internship–which was with a newspaper–and she said that she compiled a portfolio of things she’d written and submitted it. She is so inspirational because she has accomplished so much already. I promised her I’d email her a cover letter and resume. Keep your fingers crossed that she takes me on as either a writing/editing intern for Baltimore Magazine!

Next, I talked to Fitz Fitzgerald. I was not particularly interested in his main profession, which had something to do with educational publishing, but moreso his hobby: critiquing fiction. Aside from journalism, I am very much interested in editing the fictional work of others. Mr. Fitzgerald spoke of how a poet he critiqued initially didn’t like him for his criticism, which, for me, was funny and relatable–for one, I can identify with wanting to attack someone that harms my babies (my writing), and two, I’ve had much experience in critiquing sensitive writers. I asked Mr. Fitzgerald how he got into this sort of work and he said that he joined a group of freelancing editors. He told me that if I wanted to do the same, I should google such groups–he couldn’t think of any of the names off top of his head. One thing he reminded me though was that doing this sort of freelancing didn’t pay much–which was a little disconcerting, but kind of what I expected.

After speaking with Mr. Fitzgerald, I spoke with Ms. Del Genis, a technical writer. I wanted to talk to her because I found her to be one of the more interesting people on the panel due to her eccentricity. More than this, she left a cliff-hanger in he panel answer regarding something called “Global English”, which I wanted to know more about. She said that in her world of technical writing, “Global English” was growing to be very important and will probably be even more important in the future. So, I asked her what it was and got an answer, which I will try to re-word here–if I even understood it correctly: “Global English” is a way of writing English in such a way that it is so simple and basic (structure-wise, word use-wise, etc.) that a machine (can’t recall the name) could translate it into any major languages well enough for actual human translators to further translate. Ms. Del Genis said that despite making more money as a technical writer than she would’ve as a teacher or creative writer, her creative life has been sacrificed to work. I appreciated her candidness in telling me that. I tried to suggest/ask if she would be willing to devote more time to her creativity and take a slight loss on money, but she seemed a little hesitant to make that change. Technical writing, I think, is still an option I’m willing to leave open, but if I do get into that field, I hope to not donate so much time to it that it silences my creative side.

Lastly, I talked to Ms. Hauck of Agora and Ms. Lindholm of Scribe America. Ms. Lindholm talked to our group about being a medical scribe, which is something I don’t think I’d be interested in–despite the perks of the job being so awesome (expense-paid travel). When I talked to Ms. Hauck my main intention was to figure out exactly what Agora was all about. I knew that Stevenson and Agora had close ties being as though a lot of alumni have gone on to work for the company, but I had never had a clear understanding of what they published. Much to my disappointment, I cannot recall what Ms. Hauck said Agora publishes, however I remember that she told me that Agora does not publish fiction. She did say there are ways to be creative with what you write and encouraged me to intern, or better, apply for a job. Before the event, I probably would’ve thought to myself, “Nah”. What I learned from the event, though, was that I should broaden my horizons and be open to more internship opportunities because I can learn a number of skills as well as things about myself through different, unexpected experiences.

Overall, the event was spectacular. I appreciate Jennifer Jericho and Dr. Smith for putting on this event for us. I only wish the panelists and other guests were required to bring in a list of websites/sources that led them to their own career. I think that would be helpful because one can only remember so much of what they say and they’d probably think of more valuable information to give if they had time of their own to compile some.

PS: Them roast beef sandwiches was on point.