Trump admin to shutter international immigration offices

Trump admin to shutter international immigration offices

Article by John Bowden and Rafael Bernal (https://thehill.com/policy/international/433714-trump-admin-to-shutter-21-international-immigration-offices)

I find it odd that the Hill, a news organization that sits to the right, would pick the word shutter to describe a recent administration move. Shutter evokes a sense of finality, a last weary sigh as all of one’s effort has been expended and there is no other choice than to call it quits. By using this word “shutter” the authors make this piece human from the outset, which doesn’t seem like a wise decision for an organization with conservative leanings. This article does however, heavily quote individuals associated with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) when they created this article. This move, according to this article, is intended as a consolidation effort to address issues of budget and backlog. This article also quotes the head of the agency, Director L. Francis Cissna, as they address the decision to “shutter” (again a rather emotional word) their 21 offices and consolidate them into existing embassies and stateside offices. Cissna states while this change may be difficult, it is their intention to make the transition as smooth as possible. According to another, unnamed, official in the agency, this move is cost-cutting measure, and approximately 70 of the agency’s staff would be reassigned to other agencies. Oddly, at this point the article begins to criticize this move ( I saw odd as this is a conservative leaning news outlet). The authors quote a democrat house member, who states the move “sounds like a really dumb idea”. This move is exceedingly odd from a conservative organization.

Trump declares ‘country is full’ in Fox News interview, says US can no longer accept illegal immigrants

The article Trump declares ‘country is full’ in Fox News interview, says US can no longer accept illegal immigrants by Lukas Mikelionis was posted on Fox News. The article discusses the U.S immigration system and its ability to allow asylum seekers. The article recounts Trumps visit to the border area of California. When asked by Fox New’s Griff Jenkins about the second generation of DACA forming, President Trump stated, “No, we’re witnessing people that are going to be brought out of the country, the country is full.”

The presidents of Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador offered to have a summit with President Trump, but he declined. The article discusses how Customs and Boarder Protection is “on track to apprehend almost 1 million illegal immigrants at the boarder this year.”

One issue that I noticed with the article is the use of the term “immigrants” opposed to asylum seekers. The article also reinforces that the asylum seekers are “illegal immigrants” five times throughout the text. In addition, the article mostly quotes Presidents Trumps speech and does not provide outside facts to support his ideas. This article does seem to be biased, as Fox new usually is. However, it involves a different bias than CNN, as Fox News is known to have a conservative bias.

Mikelionis, Lukas. “Trump Declares ‘Country Is Full’ in Fox News Interview, Says US Can No Longer Accept Illegal Immigrants.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 6 Apr. 2019, www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-declares-the-country-full-in-fox-news-interview-says-american-can-no-longer-accept-illegal-immigrants.

Trump Administration Seeks To Close International Immigration Offices

Trump Administration Seeks To Close International Immigration Offices

Article created by Vanessa Romo and Joel Rose for NPR            (https://www.npr.org/2019/03/12/702807908/trump-administration-seeks-to-close-international-immigration-offices)

For a news organization that sits left of center, and often reports with a bias against the current president, the title of this article seems oddly stale. NPR, or National Public Radio, is an organization that one would expect a slightly more loaded title, instead it seems rather on the nose. However, it should be noted that the actual content of this story is certainly titled left. This article lays out a recent administration decision to cut down on the number of foreign offices the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services from 23 to 0. These planned closures would save millions of dollars each year according to the Trump administration. With the closure of these offices, and much of the Agency in general, the duties would be transferred to the State Department, Defense Department, and the Department of Homeland Security. A spokesperson for the USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) claimed that this would not result in a bottleneck for those seeking asylum in the US. It is at this point that the NPR story begins to show its bias as they then begin to discuss the potential negative impacts of closing these offices. The authors of this story quote Sarah Pierce, a policy analyst for Migration Policy Institute, who states that this decision would likely exacerbate the existing bottleneck in the process that already exists. The authors of this piece continue in this vain for the last few paragraphs of this article, making the prediction that this move would result in further calls for more reductions in immigration.

Return-to-Mexico policy

The Trump Administration developed the Migrant Protection Protocols program, also known as the “Remain in Mexico” program. This program requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico for the duration of their immigration hearing. This program is causing confusion and problems for both asylum seekers and the lawyers who are trying to represent them.

The article Immigration lawyers struggle to navigate return-to-Mexico policy by Priscilla Alvarez for CNN covers the topic in detail. The article utilized interviews and quotes from outside sources whom have had issues with the policy. This includes Andrew Nietor, an immigration attorney bases in San Diego, CA. In addition, the article includes facts from The Department of Homeland Security and the American Immigration Council. These statistics provide concrete information to support the claim that legal representation is important. According to The Department of Homeland Security, as of March 12, the US has returned 240 migrants to Mexico. The article then goes to state how legal representation has a huge impact on this issue.

The article is biased, as CNN typically is. The article discusses President Trumps opinion on immigration and his recent actions when mocking and questioning the immigration system. Another issue is that the only hyperlinks within the piece are to other CNN articles. This means that the reader does not get linked outside of CNN to any beneficial information.

Overall, the article is biased but is not overt. The use of statistics and quotes distracts from the bias of the article. The author tells the story of asylum seekers in a way that interests but clearly does not favor the policy or current administration.

Alvarez, Priscilla. “Immigration Lawyers Struggle to Navigate Return-to-Mexico Policy.” CNN, Cable News Network, 1 Apr. 2019, www.cnn.com/2019/03/30/politics/immigration-lawyers-remain-in-mexico/index.html.

Carlos Hernandez

Carlos Hernandez visited our class on February 26, 2019, and he talked about his experiences as a writer. Carlos was a good speaker, and he gave our class great advice about how to not let anyone’s opinion become an obstacle when writing. He told the class how he does not focus on the few negative reviews that readers post online about his work, but rather he continues to write and not allow it to discourage him. Carlos described that he attempted to create a workspace to write in, but sometimes writing whenever and wherever you are can be the best place for you to work, like in the New York City subway. I was very impressed by his success and how he is pressed for time by having to write a large number of words for his next book that is due soon. I wish him the best, and I hope that he is able to get a movie deal for one of his books.

AWE Grant Pitch

I have chosen the Asylee Women’s Enterprise as the organization that I would like to focus on for my grant proposal. For my proposal, I would like to collect book bags and fill them with educational and fun items for children. This would provide them with something to take home and further their learning.

The money could be used to purchase the book bags and items to fill such as books, coloring, stuffed animals or other items. I would like to have an event on campus where students come to stuff the book bags and prepare them. The event could be held in Rockland Banquet and the items would be pre-purchased. While the students stuff the bags, AWE could have speakers, asylum seekers or representatives speak to us and educate the students. This way, students could learn about who they are helping and questions. If funds allow, food could even be provided for this event. I think this would be a great way to physically help AWE and educate students who are on campus. If we are able to properly market this event, we could have a great student turn out.